can a landlord charge first last and security and if they do what are the ramifications of such?
It has happened to me!
Asked 613 days ago
It has happened to me!
Answers must adhere to our Terms of Use. To create links, just type the address with no HTML code. You can edit your answer at any time.
2 Total Answers
Answer by tonestar on Mar 26, 2008 at 9:18AM
Why wouldn't they be allowed to?
Comment by unhappyrenter0011 on Apr 24, 2008 at 9:11PM
I'm not 100% sure but I think that became illegal in California several years ago. I had been looking for a place a while back and had heard landlords can only charge 1st and last or 1st and deposit but not all three.
Comments must adhere to our Terms of Use. To create links, just type the address with no HTML code. You can edit your comment at any time.
Comment by unhappyrenter0011 on Apr 24, 2008 at 9:11PM I'm not 100% sure but I think that became illegal in California several years ago. I had been looking for a place a while back and had heard landlords can only charge 1st and last or 1st and deposit but not all three.
Answer by tarne on Jul 09, 2008 at 4:37PM
A landlord can only charge you first months rent and a security deposit of up to 2 and 1/2 times the rent. So if your rent was $1000 a month you could be charged at move in $1000 rent plus a security deposit up to $2500. That doesnt include other things like credit checks etc,.
As per rammifications, probabaly just get back the extra money you put down unless you can prove other damages.
As per rammifications, probabaly just get back the extra money you put down unless you can prove other damages.
Comments must adhere to our Terms of Use. To create links, just type the address with no HTML code. You can edit your comment at any time.
1


